Minutes of the Workshop Transcribed. Speaker Dr. Maricar Prudente.
KATHA 2014 Batch 2: Day 9
Science Track: Course Assessment and Student
Learning Outcomes Part 2
Dr. Maricar Prudente
Science Education Department
De La Salle University-Manila
September 27, 2014
Minutes of the
Workshop
5. Characteristics of an Exemplary Assessment Task. 1) Valid, which
yields useful information to guide learning 2) Coherent, which should be
structured so that activities lead to desired performance product 3) Authentic,
which addresses ill-defined problems that are emerging 4) Rigorous, which
requires the use of declarative, procedural and metacognitive knowledge 5)
Engaging, which provokes student interest and persistence 6) Challenging, which
provokes and evaluates student learning 7) Respectful, which allows students to
reveal their uniqueness as learners and 8) Responsive, which provides feedback
to students leading to improvement. The speaker also shared most of her
experiences in teaching students using the simple context in their classroom,
like introducing problems on pimples and oral bacteria that the students are
able to relate to. One teacher raised the issue of using technology for more
exposure to the students. The speaker agreed with utilizing technology as much
as possible for them to be more engaged and interested in the lesson. She
introduced internet learning and gave samples of online modules. She also
emphasized that the lessons to be taught should be challenging to the students
and not easy to accomplish. Asking the students on the project they could come
up with may also help in improving the lesson at hand, the speaker added. She
again emphasized the issue of finances when applying these methods.
Teaching in the
context of assessment depends on providing effective feedback to students,
encouraging students’ active involvement in their own learning, adjusting
teaching to take account of the results of assessment, recognizing the profound
influence of assessment on students’ motivation and engagement and ensuring
that students assess themselves and understand how to improve. One thing that
the teacher must be in the classroom is unpredictable, the speaker emphasized,
so that the students will be engaged and interested in class. The teacher
should also be techy in their own way to be able to enter their world which
already started in the technology era. The speaker also shared her techniques
in manipulating the students’ addiction in technology by utilizing it in her
topics and lessons in Science. The speaker also suggested the use of a progress
chart with regards to the quizzes of her students to see their learning
development in class. As teachers, they have to be open to their students, the
speaker added, by giving them the element of choice to make them feel
responsible and empowered.
6. Implications for Learner-Centered Assessment. The students 1)
are clarified in the learning outcomes at the course planning stage 2) are
shared with the learning goals throughout the semester 3) ask appropriate and
effective questions 4) focus oral and written feedback n the learning outcomes
of lessons and tasks. The teachers on the other hand 1) encourage students’
self-assessment against the learning outcomes and 2) organize individual
student target setting that builds on previous achievement. The speaker
emphasized that the teachers should enter the students’ world of digital age so
that there is more productive learning in the classroom.
7. Rubrics. The speaker said that there should be a
question and an action in rubrics. There should be a criteria or essential
elements in the rubrics, with a clear description of performance at each
achievement level. There are also task-related rubrics for specific assessments
by indentifying the skills and abilities needed in the context of the lesson.
The teachers may also add the teamwork rubric, with expectations from group
members and their level participation. She presented a sample teamwork rubric
for the teachers, where it involves creativity, cooperativeness and
skillfulness. This entails a more objective process of making a rubric for the
students. This must be continuous and ongoing as a feedback to the students
that should be focused on quality feedback. She paralleled the use of feedback
in a classroom with a panel of judges, who first comment and provide
suggestions to the students for them to be guided in their activity. Feedback
should be 1) specific 2) descriptive 3) be offered ASAP after the event 4)
offer alternative or ask the learner to do so 5) Encourage and plan for
opportunities for the feedback and 6) involve the learner wherever possible to
improve the chance of feedback being understood and acted upon.
The teachers
should also encourage students for self-assessment to create a supportive
environment where students are willing to share and discuss on their work in
pairs, groups and with the whole class. The speaker shared some of the online
resources for assessment as a final note.
8. Workshop 1. The speaker grouped the
teacher-participants and asked them to construct conceptual test items. The
teachers presented their questions and the speaker and other teachers critiqued
and commented on their work.
9. Vee Map. This provides the students with
questions to help them with assessment, which includes skills that should be
developed such as planning, conducting and reporting. This is also to give
students a focused question. Concepts are related to each other through a
concept map, while finding out more questions lead to state claims. This shows
the template to the rubric to evaluate components and a chart to map out results
and feedback.
10. Dynamic Assessment. This is driven
by self-assessment which is trust-worthy. The speaker also discussed the
advantages and disadvantages of dynamic assessment. The speaker also shared
some of the complaints of the students with regards to this type of assessment:
1) the test did not assess what they learned 2) students have difficulty
recognizing which strategies to use 3) tests are beyond their level 4) there is
no way of assessing learning processes and 5) passed the test but did not understand.
However she said that the teachers should always challenge the students when it
comes to exams.
11. Static Assessment. There are three
types of questions for this type of assessment: 1) recall 2) algorithmic 3)
higher order, where it includes conceptual questions, translation of the
information, interpretation of info, extrapolation and evaluation 4)
misconception, i.e. identifying a common misconception and generating a
question based on it.
12. Authentic Assessment. This involves
direct evidence on the performance of the students through their tests. This is
also about how students monitor their understanding in the classroom. The
speaker suggested a progress chart. This also entails a meaningful learning in
the classroom, where the students do science experiments, conduct social
science research, write stories and reports and read and write literature. The
teachers on the other hand first determine and measure the students’ ability to
apply the knowledge. Between traditional and authentic assessment, teachers can
use both. Rubric making is still required. Such tasks may include performance
assessment tasks and portfolio. Advantages of this assessment include the
promotion of creativity, encouragement of collaboration and emphasis of
integrated learning. However this is not applied in real time teaching nowadays
the speaker said. The students should also have a self-assessment to evaluate
their own participation. Disadvantages on the other hand include time-intensive
process.
13. Metacognition. Students both
have declarative, procedural and conditional knowledge which comprises of
metacognition. The speaker asked the participants about the relationship of
these three concepts, which includes authentic assessment, constructive
feedback and self-regulated learning. One of the participants said that this
will give them more idea on how to address the problems they encounter with
their students with regards to self-regulated learning. Another said that the
teachers can diversify on the students’ knowledge and explore their
inclinations to produce self-regulated learners. The speaker then asked the
participants to use the three concept in a single sentence. One said that
authentic assessment opens the students to a world of new concepts,
constructive feedback for students to realize their strengths and
self-regulated learning for students to give them the drive and the motivation
to a certain topic or lesson. Another said authentic assessment gives the
students the opportunity to learn more and with teachers to have constructive
feedback for the students to appreciate the lessons better and become
self-regulated learners. The speaker asked more participants to make their own summarized
statements about the three concepts. She then asked about the constructive
feedback which would come from the teachers while the self-regulated learning
comes from the students. She said that authentic assessment give evidence to
how students learn in which the teachers will provide constructive feedback to
make students self-regulated learner.
14. Workshop 2. The speaker asked the teachers to
make a performance task and an authentic assessment based on the questions they
made from the previous workshop. They also have to articulate the idea using a
rubric. Each group presented their performance task and the speaker commented
on their work.
No comments:
Post a Comment